When the Expert Becomes the Patient: A LASIK Pioneer's Refractive Lens Exchange

    Have a question about your vision? We're here to help.

    Schedule a Free Consultation

    There is a particular kind of trust that can't be bought with marketing. It's the trust one surgeon places in another when the eyes on the table are his own.

    Dr. Brian Will has spent more than three decades at the leading edge of refractive surgery. He was among the first surgeons in North America to perform LASIK, helped pioneer bladeless femtosecond technique in the Pacific Northwest, and has performed well over 75,000 laser vision procedures. Dr. Jack Tian, who trained under refractive-surgery pioneers and now mentors resident ophthalmologists himself, calls Dr. Will a mentor and, only half-jokingly, "the father of modern LASIK."

    So when Dr. Will decided it was time to address his own aging vision for good, he had his pick of surgeons anywhere in the country. As he put it, he could have called any number of friends and colleagues and they'd have happily taken him on. Instead, he chose refractive lens exchange, and he chose Dr. Tian to perform it.

    This post walks through the reasoning behind both decisions, because the questions Dr. Will worked through are the same ones nearly every prospective RLE patient faces.

    Why a Refractive Surgeon Would Choose RLE at All

    Refractive lens exchange (RLE) replaces the eye's natural lens with a premium artificial lens, called an intraocular lens, or IOL. It is essentially the same procedure as modern cataract surgery, but performed proactively, before a cataract ever forms, specifically to correct vision and free a person from glasses.

    That distinction matters for someone like Dr. Will, who had already had successful laser vision correction years earlier. LASIK and PRK reshape the cornea, and they do that job beautifully. But they don't stop the natural lens inside the eye from stiffening with age, the change we all eventually feel as presbyopia, when reading glasses creep into daily life and never quite leave. RLE addresses the lens itself, which is why it can correct near, intermediate, and distance vision in a single step and, as a bonus, removes any possibility of cataracts forming down the road.

    This is a common arc. At practices that focus on lens-based surgery, a large share of RLE patients are people who had LASIK or PRK twenty or thirty years ago, were thrilled with it, and have now returned for what Dr. Will describes as the "final" correction, a lens that locks vision in for the rest of life. He was, in effect, becoming his own ideal patient.

    Moving Past the Monovision Compromise

    For years, Dr. Will lived with monovision: one eye optimized for distance, the other for near, letting the brain blend the two. It's a clever, time-tested approach, and it had served him well.

    But monovision is, in his own honest words, a compromise. Each eye carries a different job, which can subtly cost you the seamless depth perception that comes from two balanced eyes working together. Dr. Will is an avid hiker, mountain biker, kayaker, and bird watcher, and he was candid about wanting both eyes pulling in the same direction, to pick out that rare bird in the canopy before his friends do, not after.

    He frames the limitation with a rule of thumb worth remembering: monovision works well for roughly eighty percent of people, but about twenty percent never fully adapt to it. As a surgeon, you can't reliably know in advance who falls into which group. Modern full-range lenses sidestep that gamble by restoring distance, intermediate, and near vision in both eyes. Or, as Dr. Will put it, if living with one near eye and one far eye were truly the superior design, we'd all have been born that way.

    Choosing the Right Lens, the Genuinely Hard Part

    If there's a single message in Dr. Will's experience for prospective patients, it's that the lens decision deserves real thought. He described the modern menu of options as both a blessing and a burden: the good news is we have choices, and the bad news is we have choices.

    Broadly, today's premium lenses fall into a few families:

    • Multifocal and diffractive trifocal lenses, which deliver a full range of vision, near, intermediate, and far, in each eye.
    • Extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) lenses, which give an excellent continuous range but typically trade away some of the sharpest, finest near vision.
    • Light-adjustable lenses, which can be fine-tuned after surgery but often rely on a small monovision offset to maximize reading vision.

    Dr. Will deliberated and chose a multifocal diffractive lens. His reasoning was specific to his life: he still sees patients and performs delicate procedures, so giving up crisp, fine-detail near vision was simply off the table. He wanted high-quality vision at every distance, and in his clinical experience watching patients receive these newer implants, that full-range result is the ideal, so why settle for less if it can be achieved?

    It's worth noting how far the technology has come. The newest generation of diffractive lenses produces far fewer nighttime visual side effects, the rings and halos around lights that earlier lenses were known for, than the implants of even a few years ago. For most patients today, those effects are minor and fade as the brain adapts.

    RLE After LASIK: The Part Many Surgeons Quietly Avoid

    Here's a detail most patients never hear: placing a multifocal lens in an eye that has already had LASIK is, in Dr. Will's words, "looked down upon" by a lot of surgeons. The previous corneal surgery introduces a bit more measurement uncertainty, which makes hitting the target refraction harder.

    The difference comes down to depth of capability. A practice experienced in the full toolkit, lens exchange if a lens needs swapping, and a LASIK enhancement or touch-up if the cornea needs fine-tuning, can confidently manage post-LASIK eyes. Many surgeons skilled in routine cataract work have never touched up a twenty-year-old LASIK in their lives, and without that experience and willingness, these cases become genuinely challenging. With it, they work beautifully.

    Dr. Will's own eyes became the proof. He had previously had LASIK in only one eye, leaving an unusual side-by-side comparison. The morning after his RLE, both eyes tested essentially equal, and he noted that if he didn't already know which eye had been treated with LASIK, he wouldn't have been able to tell from the results. For prospective patients who had laser surgery decades ago and assume that door is now closed, that's a meaningful reassurance.

    How Mature Is This Technology, Really?

    Both surgeons were emphatic on this point. RLE built on the foundation of cataract surgery has, in Dr. Will's phrase, "come of age." This is not the wild west of twenty-five years ago. Between the safety of modern technique, the precision of today's microscopes, and the quality of current implants, lens-based refractive surgery has reached a level of predictability that simply didn't exist before.

    Will there be future improvements? Of course, it would be foolish to claim otherwise. But much as glasses and contact lenses long ago reached a comfortable plateau, today's lenses are approaching the practical limits of what's achievable, which means patients no longer have to wait for "the next thing" to get an excellent result now.

    What Recovery Actually Looks Like

    RLE recovery is quick, though it unfolds in stages. The eye takes roughly seven days to settle, but most patients are already close to 20/20 the very next morning. Vision continues to sharpen through that first week, and then refines further over the following months as the brain fully adapts to the new optics. Many patients describe their vision at three months as noticeably more seamless than at one week.

    Dr. Will's day-one results tracked ahead of that curve. Less than twenty-four hours after surgery he was reading roughly 20/25 in each eye and a soft 20/20 with both eyes together, with comfortable reading vision up close, a result he noted is better than what's typically seen on day one, particularly for a patient his age.

    He was honest about the nighttime side effects, too. The first evening, with his pupils still dilated, he noticed bright rings around point sources of light. By the next day those had largely resolved into faint, manageable starbursts, less, he remarked, than the halos he'd lived with after his original LASIK. It's an honest picture: minor, usually temporary, and for most people a fair trade for all-day freedom from glasses.

    Why This Matters If You're Considering RLE

    The throughline of Dr. Will's experience is that very few people are truly out of options anymore. Patients who were told years ago that they weren't candidates for LASIK, PRK, or other corneal procedures are frequently excellent candidates for RLE. Short of significant eye disease, almost anyone who sits in the chair can be offered a real path to glasses independence, and in a world where a phone pulls our focus from far to near and back again every few minutes, that freedom has become less a luxury than a daily relief.

    Whether RLE is right for you, and which lens best fits your eyes and your life, is a question only a thorough consultation and examination can answer. For more background, our safety and outcomes guide and complete RLE guide for Seattle-area patients are good places to start.

    An Honor We Don't Take Lightly

    It would have been easy for Dr. Will to go anywhere. What he said, after the meticulous attention to detail he'd watched Dr. Tian bring to the operating room over two years of working side by side, has stayed with us:

    "Dr. Tian's expertise is world-class, and we have a world-class team here taking care of our patients, and I trust them implicitly with my own eyes."

    To earn that kind of trust from a surgeon who has corrected the vision of tens of thousands of patients, and who chose, in the end, where to place his own, is a genuine privilege, and one we're grateful for. We simply hope to extend that same care to everyone who sits in our chair.

    Curious whether refractive lens exchange is right for you? Dr. Jack Tian and the team at Near & Far Vision Partners offer personalized consultations to walk through your options, your candidacy, and the lens best suited to your life. Schedule your consultation today.

    Watch Dr. Will's Story: Abridged

    See the highlights of Dr. Will's experience in a quick, easy-to-watch format. This short video covers why a LASIK pioneer chose refractive lens exchange, and why he trusted Dr. Jack Tian with his own eyes.

    This article is for educational purposes and reflects one patient's experience; it is not medical advice. Individual results vary, and candidacy for RLE is determined through a complete eye examination.

    Last Updated: June 2026

    This content is for educational purposes and is not intended as medical advice. Individual results vary, and a comprehensive eye examination is necessary to determine candidacy for any surgical procedure.

    Dr. Jack Tian, MD

    Written by

    Dr. Jack Tian, MD

    Medical and Facility Director

    Dr. Jack Tian is a board certified ophthalmologist, renowned for his specialization in refractive lens exchange (RLE), premium cataract surgery, intraocular lens upgrades (IOLx) and the use of implantable collamer lenses (ICL). His undergraduate degree was in molecular biology from UC Berkeley. He earned his Medical Degree from David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and completed advanced ophthalmology surgical training at the Flaum Eye Institute at the University of Rochester.

    View full profile →